Version 2.00

Author	Message
Kevin Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 27 Jul 12 Posts: 337 Credit: 3,466,476 RAC: 18,539	Message 144 - Posted: 7 Aug 2012 \| 9:07:55 UTC Last modified: 7 Aug 2012 \| 10:06:50 UTC
	I've fixed a few of the problems you folks have identified. The F77 does not produce numbers to as many decimal places The validator is more flexible and should now be happy with *Nix vs Windows generated numbers I've supplemented the checkpointing with my own so we can really see what is happening Moved up to the m1.small AWS instance The weird time estimates on the wrapper is proving a thorny one. ____________ Regards Kevin ----- International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research
	ID: 144 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: /

ChertseyAl Send message Joined: 3 Aug 12 Posts: 60 Credit: 55,262 RAC: 0	Message 146 - Posted: 7 Aug 2012 \| 9:27:38 UTC - in response to Message 144.
	The weird time estimates on the wrapper is proving a thorny one. I've got a WU running on a 6.10.60 version of BOINC and it seems OK compared to everything I've run on 5.10.45. It would be great if it could be fixed for version 5.x though. Cheers, Al.
	ID: 146 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: /

Mankka* Send message Joined: 3 Aug 12 Posts: 38 Credit: 3,515,993 RAC: 2	Message 150 - Posted: 7 Aug 2012 \| 10:55:07 UTC Last modified: 7 Aug 2012 \| 10:55:47 UTC
	@Kevin ! I downloaded some 2.00 ones to one of my boxes. The server sent out 3 wu's to 3 users, but the most of them was sent twice to me, to the same box ??? And I can see those double wu's in the Boinc client with different last number of course. Please check out my box and look at computers under those 2.00 tasks. http://ec2-23-23-126-96.compute-1.amazonaws.com/pogs/results.php?hostid=33&offset=0&show_names=0&state=1&appid=
	ID: 150 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: /

Mankka* Send message Joined: 3 Aug 12 Posts: 38 Credit: 3,515,993 RAC: 2	Message 160 - Posted: 7 Aug 2012 \| 18:32:31 UTC
	Tested 2.00 on another comp and the same happened with it, got 2 of the 3 copies sent to the same machine. http://ec2-23-23-126-96.compute-1.amazonaws.com/pogs/results.php?hostid=46&offset=0&show_names=0&state=1&appid= I think you have missed some settings that prevents the server from sending more than one copy of the wu to the same computer. I worst cases the user have to run the same wu twice and also verifying the wu with the same computer, not good for the project. This did not happen with the 1.02 version, perhapps some of you guys can give a clue how to solve it ?
	ID: 160 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: /

Kevin Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 27 Jul 12 Posts: 337 Credit: 3,466,476 RAC: 18,539	Message 165 - Posted: 8 Aug 2012 \| 2:55:36 UTC - in response to Message 160.
	@Mankka Thanks - my Fabric script deleted a line from the config.xml - fixed both ____________ Regards Kevin ----- International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research
	ID: 165 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: /

ChertseyAl Send message Joined: 3 Aug 12 Posts: 60 Credit: 55,262 RAC: 0	Message 266 - Posted: 11 Aug 2012 \| 17:53:03 UTC - in response to Message 144.
	The weird time estimates on the wrapper is proving a thorny one. Any news? :) Odd that it works in opposite ways on linux and Windows. Windows keeps resetting, linux ramps up like it's a time machine. Not a big deal if it only affects older BOINC versions, I'll just have to limit my involvement to one host and leave the rest of the farm for other projects :) Cheers, Al. ____________
	ID: 266 \| Rating: 0 \| rate: /

Message boards : News : Version 2.00

		Supported by: